That time of year again
26/01/07 14:11 Coffee machine moments
Permalink
OK, I've been quiet lately but it's that time of year
for self-employed people - 31 January and therefore
tax deadline day is only days away.
Yicch.
For people who aren't self-employed, the system works thus: you declare your income and expenditure for the financial year ended pretty much ages ago and send your figures in. You also put in your personal finances for the same period. Your accountant calls you in a panic - or rather doesn't because he's up to his eyes. You then find out he or she needs more detail and they assume you know exactly what by osmosis.
I'll be blogging again by the end of the week. Just don't be surprised if the blog looks somehow tear-stained...
Yicch.
For people who aren't self-employed, the system works thus: you declare your income and expenditure for the financial year ended pretty much ages ago and send your figures in. You also put in your personal finances for the same period. Your accountant calls you in a panic - or rather doesn't because he's up to his eyes. You then find out he or she needs more detail and they assume you know exactly what by osmosis.
I'll be blogging again by the end of the week. Just don't be surprised if the blog looks somehow tear-stained...
|
Shilpa
18/01/07 10:51 Media
issues Permalink
The Shilpa Shetty/Big Brother stuff is coming to a
head nicely - 21,000 complaints at last count because
of racism in the house. There are arguments and
counter-arguments; I'd have to agree on the surface
that 'dog', which she has been called, is not
actually a racist term of abuse, it's usually sexist,
but in the context of all the rest it's probably been
applied to her because she's Indian and therefore a
"Paki" (although how that's supposed to work
geographically I have no idea - presumably the bigots
will find someone from Pakistan and call them an Indi
in the interests of balance).
Personally I'm delighted by what's happening. Let me rephrase. I deplore what's happening to Ms. Shetty as an individual - nobody should have to go through that. On the other hand, in my experience most racists and bigots shout their abuse at people who are different then go home and forget about them. It rarely occurs to them that these people are individuals with families, feelings and rights. On Celebrity Big Brother the bigots can watch the abuse and no doubt find it jolly amusing - but then they have to watch the reaction. Probably for the first time they're sitting there seeing what happens after someone is abused simply for their skin colour and culture, when they're by themselves and quiet. I doubt that they would have realised the insult doesn't just go away once the aggressor has left the scene.
If one person, be they a builder or a ballet dancer, thinks twice about shouting abuse next time, or reconsiders their BNP membership as a result of watching Shilpa, this might have been worth it.
Personally I'm delighted by what's happening. Let me rephrase. I deplore what's happening to Ms. Shetty as an individual - nobody should have to go through that. On the other hand, in my experience most racists and bigots shout their abuse at people who are different then go home and forget about them. It rarely occurs to them that these people are individuals with families, feelings and rights. On Celebrity Big Brother the bigots can watch the abuse and no doubt find it jolly amusing - but then they have to watch the reaction. Probably for the first time they're sitting there seeing what happens after someone is abused simply for their skin colour and culture, when they're by themselves and quiet. I doubt that they would have realised the insult doesn't just go away once the aggressor has left the scene.
If one person, be they a builder or a ballet dancer, thinks twice about shouting abuse next time, or reconsiders their BNP membership as a result of watching Shilpa, this might have been worth it.
To review or not to review
12/01/07 09:20 Media
issues Permalink
Interesting entry in Kieren McCarthy's blog this
week. For those who haven't clicked through,
he's been on the radio talking about Windows
Vista, the new version of Windows, but he's
conceding he hasn't actually seen it.
Initially my reaction was one of anger; he's been on
the radio (something I'm keen to build on as
long-term readers will know, so let's acknowledge the
professional jealousy angle immediately) and talked
about something of which he has little first-hand
knowledge. And contrary to his blog's claim that
Microsoft didn't send out any review copies of
Windows Vista for review until January, I and loads
of other tech journalists have been playing with the
beta release for months (you get it by phoning the
press office and asking).
Then I had another think. Isn't every journalist prone to review books or equipment turning up late? Can we honestly all claim that we've never done anything in a hurry with a slightly shaky brief? So how is this case different and why did I react angrily?
Two possible reasons spring to mind. One is simple professional jealousy. I'm not proud of my feelings here but I'd love to go on the World Service and if I've seen Vista and used it then a large part of me says that should have been my gig rather than that of someone who hasn't even seen the damned thing. The second, which is more serious to my mind, is in blogging the transgression afterwards. If someone found the broadcast interesting they might, for example, do a web search on the journalists involved. They might find the blog and then see the programme completely undermined by one of the contributors.
As a competitive journalist I'm annoyed at it for reasons of petty jealousy, I admit it. If I were the producer and found my programme being apparently dismissed in this way, I think I'd be furious.
Then I had another think. Isn't every journalist prone to review books or equipment turning up late? Can we honestly all claim that we've never done anything in a hurry with a slightly shaky brief? So how is this case different and why did I react angrily?
Two possible reasons spring to mind. One is simple professional jealousy. I'm not proud of my feelings here but I'd love to go on the World Service and if I've seen Vista and used it then a large part of me says that should have been my gig rather than that of someone who hasn't even seen the damned thing. The second, which is more serious to my mind, is in blogging the transgression afterwards. If someone found the broadcast interesting they might, for example, do a web search on the journalists involved. They might find the blog and then see the programme completely undermined by one of the contributors.
As a competitive journalist I'm annoyed at it for reasons of petty jealousy, I admit it. If I were the producer and found my programme being apparently dismissed in this way, I think I'd be furious.
Tomorrow's World is back
09/01/07 11:22 Media
issues Permalink
Albeit only as a brand within the BBC, talking about
tech stories under the auspices of Maggie Philbin. On
a personal level of course I find this highly
frustrating. Readers will be aware that over
Christmas I did a little tech spot on BBC London and
if all of the tech spots are now going to come under
one banner then it's thank you and goodnight to me.
I'm looking forward to it, though, not because of the quality of the stories or the (deserved) resurgence in Maggie Philbin's career, but because they might start dropping clangers again. Does everyone else remember how we were all going to be wearing high-tech clothing made of old vinyl records by the 1980s (predicted in the 1960s)? Or how CDs were foolproof and completely indestructible?
Of course there'll be the sensible stuff as well, but personally I wish Maggie Philbin every success and courage in coming out with as much cock-eyed tripe as the new formats will take. That was always half the fun of the original.
I'm looking forward to it, though, not because of the quality of the stories or the (deserved) resurgence in Maggie Philbin's career, but because they might start dropping clangers again. Does everyone else remember how we were all going to be wearing high-tech clothing made of old vinyl records by the 1980s (predicted in the 1960s)? Or how CDs were foolproof and completely indestructible?
Of course there'll be the sensible stuff as well, but personally I wish Maggie Philbin every success and courage in coming out with as much cock-eyed tripe as the new formats will take. That was always half the fun of the original.
My favourite thing...
08/01/07 19:29 Coffee machine moments
Permalink
...is also the least sociable thing I've done for
ages by far but hey. that's life. On Boxing Day -
that's Boxing Day, mark you - I was up at 6.00am to
drive to the BBC for an 8.40 interview. I've been
trying to get a slot on the breakfast show for, oh,
ages now and finally they called me in.
A cynic - OK, my father-in-law - might suggest that they'd take anyone mug enough to get up at that time on Boxing Day but I can only say that the combination of producer Sarah Ryan and presenters JoAnne Good and Baylen Leonard are an unusually welcoming combination, particularly since they'd been broadcasting since 6.00 and no doubt preparing the show for an hour or so before then.
Sometimes you get these things you really want to do again. Fingers crossed.
A cynic - OK, my father-in-law - might suggest that they'd take anyone mug enough to get up at that time on Boxing Day but I can only say that the combination of producer Sarah Ryan and presenters JoAnne Good and Baylen Leonard are an unusually welcoming combination, particularly since they'd been broadcasting since 6.00 and no doubt preparing the show for an hour or so before then.
Sometimes you get these things you really want to do again. Fingers crossed.